More Savage loving

Conversation continues about interpretation of Dan Savage’s sexual ethics.  Savage himself responds to Lindsay Beyerstein thusly: Terry and I wouldn’t describe ourselves as monogamous-apart-from-an-occassional because we wouldn’t—couldn’t—feel comfortable using the word “monogamous” in reference to ourselves, not even monogamous-with-an-asterisks, because technically we’re, you know, not. But we kindasorta hate the term non-monogamous because when a gay.

Read More

The problem with “Jesus chicken”

Read More

Some random musings on “forever”

Read More

Equality worth working for

Read More

Wow

Read More

Some thoughts on “opting out.”

Read More

Dog botherers

Read More

Who do you admire?

Read More

“Survival and reproduction are in fact most definitely amoral.”

Read More